Posts
Pharmaceutical companies are a large industry that manufacture so many things. They make mostly medicines, among many other things, and they can come in various forms. From tablets to capsules and syrups, these things require some sort of equipment to make. The machinery and apparatus used for this also have standards to follow for making sure that the quantities of substances are at a proper amount.
Having only a few manufacturers make it safer for consumers to know what to buy, since having too many options may raise the possibility of side effects. These medicines have a standard to follow, but the machines that make them do not. At the consumer perspective it may not make as much sense to address something as trivial as tablet punches and dies.
There is an issue regarding this in the industry though. There are calls to standardized the equipment used for compression. Notice that tablets come in different forms and sizes. Since it is a solid dosage in units, there has to be some form of filler to keep the actual medicine intact. Standardizing the machine that compresses these things have many benefits for those that produce it.
Specifications for these products vary from one standard to another. So far there are two widely used standards for tablet compressions. One is the European ISO and second is the TSM or the tablet Specification Manual, most commonly used in North America. These dies and punches may only have a a few differences but their individual effects vary and have a huge impact on the product.
You may be wondering what the big deal is about the whole standardization thing, it is just tablets, after all. Having the same specifications for all the equipment, tablet dies and punches alike, for this machinery can affect manufacturing a lot. On the consumer end, this can lessen the cost of the product. At the manufacturer end, this can lessen costs of operations and other supplementary, over head expenses.
Standardization for tooling can mean that technicians would cater to the same problems for tablet dies and punches used all over the world. This helps the OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturers address problems quickly since many can now contribute to giving a solution. The technical differences involved here are totally eliminated. Replacement of minor parts on the machine also become more convenient.
The differences are very small but these minor variations are what makes interchangeability impossible between machines. The punches and dies have to be compatible for them to work properly. This makes the whole tablet making process costly. Pharmaceutical companies would have to have a variety of machines just to follow the set qualifications depending on where they will be selling the product.
Standardization for this process has been discussed and conceptualized since the early 90s. While the goal of only having one set of qualifications for tablet production is still not available, the ISO or International Organization for Standardization has approved the European standard back in the mid 90s. Despite this achievement towards the goal, the TSM is still practiced.
There is a call for some standardization for something that is so seemingly minor as nominal punch length, rotation and so on. This allows for better problem solving and addressing issues from one expert to another since there would be no specialized knowledge needed to address the technical difficulty. More importantly the quality of the products made would be uniformed and anything that goes beyond this uniformity can be easily checked and inspected.
Having only a few manufacturers make it safer for consumers to know what to buy, since having too many options may raise the possibility of side effects. These medicines have a standard to follow, but the machines that make them do not. At the consumer perspective it may not make as much sense to address something as trivial as tablet punches and dies.
There is an issue regarding this in the industry though. There are calls to standardized the equipment used for compression. Notice that tablets come in different forms and sizes. Since it is a solid dosage in units, there has to be some form of filler to keep the actual medicine intact. Standardizing the machine that compresses these things have many benefits for those that produce it.
Specifications for these products vary from one standard to another. So far there are two widely used standards for tablet compressions. One is the European ISO and second is the TSM or the tablet Specification Manual, most commonly used in North America. These dies and punches may only have a a few differences but their individual effects vary and have a huge impact on the product.
You may be wondering what the big deal is about the whole standardization thing, it is just tablets, after all. Having the same specifications for all the equipment, tablet dies and punches alike, for this machinery can affect manufacturing a lot. On the consumer end, this can lessen the cost of the product. At the manufacturer end, this can lessen costs of operations and other supplementary, over head expenses.
Standardization for tooling can mean that technicians would cater to the same problems for tablet dies and punches used all over the world. This helps the OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturers address problems quickly since many can now contribute to giving a solution. The technical differences involved here are totally eliminated. Replacement of minor parts on the machine also become more convenient.
The differences are very small but these minor variations are what makes interchangeability impossible between machines. The punches and dies have to be compatible for them to work properly. This makes the whole tablet making process costly. Pharmaceutical companies would have to have a variety of machines just to follow the set qualifications depending on where they will be selling the product.
Standardization for this process has been discussed and conceptualized since the early 90s. While the goal of only having one set of qualifications for tablet production is still not available, the ISO or International Organization for Standardization has approved the European standard back in the mid 90s. Despite this achievement towards the goal, the TSM is still practiced.
There is a call for some standardization for something that is so seemingly minor as nominal punch length, rotation and so on. This allows for better problem solving and addressing issues from one expert to another since there would be no specialized knowledge needed to address the technical difficulty. More importantly the quality of the products made would be uniformed and anything that goes beyond this uniformity can be easily checked and inspected.
About the Author:
If you are looking for information about tablet punches and dies, come to our web pages here. More details can be seen at http://www.tabtooling.com now.
No comments:
Post a Comment